Start with your email
Tell us where and when you interviewed. If your report looks eligible, we send the full submission questionnaire.
Gothamloop pays for fresh, firsthand SWE interview intel. Tell us exactly what you were asked — the prompt, constraints, follow-ups, interviewer signals, and answer direction. High-signal submissions that pass our checks may qualify for gift cards up to $250.
"I got a graph question" is not useful. A strong submission tells us what was asked, why it was hard, what constraints mattered, what follow-ups came next, and what the interviewer seemed to reward.
This is intentionally selective. Gothamloop is building current interview intelligence, so the process rewards freshness, specificity, and credibility.
Tell us where and when you interviewed. If your report looks eligible, we send the full submission questionnaire.
Provide exact prompts, round details, constraints, follow-ups, hints, interviewer reactions, and your answer direction.
We check consistency, freshness, uniqueness, and credibility. Gift card amount depends on the usefulness of the verified intel.
No secondhand reports, no friend summaries, no recruiter gossip, no copied posts from Blind, Reddit, Discord, 1Point3Acres, or any other community.
Last 30 days is ideal. Last 60–90 days may still qualify if the report is unusually thorough or independently corroborated.
Do not send screenshots, coding assessment links, internal documents, company files, proprietary code, private candidate portal content, or NDA-covered material.
Include company, role, level, round type, interview date, exact prompt, constraints, examples, follow-ups, hints, edge cases, and evaluation signals.
This can include a redacted recruiter email or calendar invite. Redact personal data and never share private company systems or confidential attachments.
Thin reports, recycled internet questions, conflicting details, fabricated timelines, or material that appears unauthorized will not qualify.
We pay for signal, not volume. One excellent report can be more valuable than ten vague submissions.
Was this question asked recently enough to be useful to current candidates?
Can another engineer understand the exact prompt, constraints, follow-ups, and evaluation direction?
Is this report new to us, or is it a generic question already widely available?
Do the details hold together after our consistency, corroboration, and verification checks?
Start here. The full questionnaire should only go to people who appear eligible, so this form acts as the first filter.
















